MVP Race: Jokic vs. Gilgeous-Alexander
The MVP race is heating up between Nikola Jokic and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. Gilgeous-Alexander is on track to join a select group of players who won the scoring title while leading their team to the best record, a feat historically strongly correlated with MVP awards. Advanced stats also suggest Gilgeous-Alexander`s exceptional value this season.
While both players have strong arguments, some insiders lean towards Gilgeous-Alexander due to his team`s dominant performance in the Western Conference and his league-leading scoring. However, Jokic`s consistent excellence, including three previous MVP awards and a championship, makes him a compelling contender. The decision is difficult, with valid arguments for both.
Ultimately, the MVP award often comes down to narrative and voter preference, rather than solely “deserving” the award. Both Jokic and Gilgeous-Alexander have presented undeniable cases, making this year`s MVP race particularly intriguing.
Defensive Player of the Year: A Wide-Open Field
The Defensive Player of the Year award is considered wide open this year, especially with Victor Wembanyama out of contention. Luguentz Dort is highlighted as a strong candidate, anchoring the league`s top defense. Despite not having standout traditional defensive stats, Dort`s impact and tenacity are highly valued by his team.
Other potential DPOY candidates mentioned include Evan Mobley, Jaren Jackson Jr., Draymond Green, and Ivica Zubac. The absence of a clear favorite reflects a season where team defense and coaching schemes are as impactful as individual dominance.
Some argue that Dort could win as a representative of the Thunder`s overall defensive strength, similar to Marcus Smart`s win in the past. However, historically, the award often goes to big men, making Mobley and Green strong contenders.
Draymond Green is also presented as a compelling option due to his defensive IQ and impact on the Golden State Warriors` defense. His ability to limit opponents` shooting efficiency around the basket is particularly noteworthy.
The experts agree that the DPOY race is unusually open, making it difficult to predict a clear winner.
Most Improved Player: Defining Improvement
The definition of “Most Improved Player” is debated, particularly regarding players who were already considered stars. Cade Cunningham, despite significant stats, is seen by some as already being too established to be a true MIP candidate. The debate centers on whether the award should recognize a leap from obscurity to good player or from stardom to superstardom.
Tyler Herro is suggested as a more fitting MIP candidate, having achieved All-Star status and carrying his team effectively. Amen Thompson, another high draft pick, is also considered, but like Cunningham, may not fit the traditional MIP mold.
Evan Mobley is also mentioned as a strong MIP contender, demonstrating significant offensive and defensive growth and achieving All-Star recognition. His development has silenced previous concerns about stagnation.
Cade Cunningham`s leadership of the Detroit Pistons to a more competitive season is highlighted as a testament to his improvement and potential superstar trajectory, especially with improved team support.
Sixth Man of the Year: Future All-Stars?
Historically, few Sixth Man of the Year winners have gone on to become All-Stars. This year`s candidates, including Payton Pritchard, Malik Beasley, and Ty Jerome, are not seen as likely to break that trend. Payton Pritchard is recognized for his valuable role with the Celtics but not as a future All-Star.
Russell Westbrook is mentioned as a potential down-ballot candidate who might receive an honorary All-Star selection later in his career, but not as a typical breakout Sixth Man turned All-Star.
Naz Reid, a previous Sixth Man winner, is discussed as a possible exception to the trend. His versatility and impact for the Timberwolves, especially when given starter minutes, suggest he could potentially become an All-Star in the future.
The 65-Game Rule: Fact or Fiction?
Experts are largely in agreement that the NBA`s 65-game rule, implemented for award eligibility, should be reconsidered or eliminated. Concerns are raised about players feeling pressured to play through injury and the rule`s inflexibility, potentially excluding deserving players due to minor games missed.
Specifically, the rule`s impact on All-Defensive and All-NBA team selections is questioned, as defensive specialists may not always play heavy minutes across 65 games. The argument is made that voters should be trusted to make informed decisions without a rigid games-played requirement.
Some suggest keeping the rule to incentivize star players to play more often but propose removing the minutes limit, particularly for All-Defensive teams. However, the overall sentiment leans towards trusting voter judgment and removing or tweaking the 65-game rule.
