Chael Sonnen believes Alex Pereira is making an error by pursuing an immediate rematch with Magomed Ankalaev.
Following his recent loss to Magomed Ankalaev at UFC 313, where Pereira surrendered his light heavyweight title, discussions quickly shifted to a potential rematch. Despite pre-fight talks about Pereira potentially moving up to heavyweight, Sonnen argues that a second fight with Ankalaev is not advisable.
Sonnen, a self-proclaimed fan of Pereira, stated on Submission Radio that he saw nothing in their first encounter to suggest a different outcome in a rematch. He highlighted that Ankalaev dominated the fight, winning four out of five rounds. While Pereira showed some defense against takedowns, Sonnen believes it`s unlikely Pereira can significantly change the dynamic in a second fight.
Sonnen reasons that any improvements Pereira might make, Ankalaev is equally capable of learning and adapting. He points out that Ankalaev, who faced takedown defense from Pereira, would be motivated to adjust his strategy and likely secure takedowns in a rematch, which Sonnen believes would favor Ankalaev in the judges` eyes.
Pereira`s desire for a rematch stems from a belief he can perform better with improved preparation, citing issues he faced leading up to their first fight. However, Sonnen contends that Pereira is missing a bigger picture. He suggests that the heavyweight division represents a greater opportunity for Pereira than settling scores with Ankalaev.
Sonnen finds the rematch decision surprising and risky. He recalls Pereira`s move to light heavyweight was facilitated by a loss at middleweight, freeing him from divisional obligations. Sonnen argues that a loss to Ankalaev has already opened the door for a heavyweight move, potentially to challenge for the title. He suggests Pereira should capitalize on this opportunity instead of risking another loss to Ankalaev, which could be more damaging to his reputation.
While a rematch between Pereira and Ankalaev is anticipated later this year, possibly in August, Sonnen`s analysis raises questions about the strategic wisdom of Pereira`s choice.
